Friday, August 25, 2006

Putting a face on it

"Stay the course" sounds appealing in the abstract because, let's face it, nobody likes a quitter and most people desperately want their country to succeed. But when you get behind the political rhetoric and focus on the human toll of Bush's Iraq policy, the slogans seem barren and not a little repulsive. I'm a big fan of critical analysis (at least in others) and I tend to eschew emotional arguments but I don't think you can examine a war policy from a completely detached position.

This young man, who doesn't even look old enough to shave, is Marine Cpl. Stephen Bixler. He is, sadly, Connecticut's most recent casualty of the Iraq war. He was killed May 4, 2006 while on foot patrol in the province of Fallujah.

The Hartford Courant wrote: "Bixler leaves behind his parents, Richard and Linda; a twin sister, Sandra; and dozens of people who knew him as intelligent and athletic, and as a quiet but strong leader, whether it was in the Boy Scouts or on the high school cross-country team."

The only reason I'm writing about this is because I saw a Chris Matthews interview with Van Taylor, an Iraq war veteran who is running for Congress in the district that includes Mr. Bush's Crawford ranch. He's a Republican and he favors "seeing Iraq through" to victory.

He supports the president, he supports the continuation of the war and, despite being a Congressional candidate, he cannot tell us why we invaded Iraq:

MATTHEWS: So why did we attack Iraq then? Why did we attack Iraq then?

TAYLOR: Regardless of why we may have started fighting, and I served as a marine ...

MATTHEWS: I‘m asking the question, why did we attack Iraq? Why did we go into Iraq?

TAYLOR: That‘s not the question that we need answered.

MATTHEWS: It‘s mine.

TAYLOR: It‘s what do we do now?

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: What‘s wrong with me asking the question? We are in a war.

Pearl Harbor started World War II.

TAYLOR: That‘s a question you can ask ...

MATTHEWS: What start it? Why did we go into Iraq?

TAYLOR: That is a question you can ask historians, but today we need to send people to Washington who understand the war on terror. There is not a single member of the United States Congress that has served in the war on terror, and there are only two dozen combat veterans. I will be the very first. We need to send people like me in Washington. [Full transcript here]


In three months we will have been in Iraq as long as we were in WWII and the supporters of this war still can't tell us why we're there. (During Vietnam -- before this blogger's living memory --- they couldn't tell us how we'd get out, but at least they told us why we were there!)

As Election Day approaches, Americans -- foremost among them people like the Bixler family -- have an absolute right to have that question answered.

5 comments:

Kirk said...

You may want to check out this article, seems right up your alley

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/08/24/BL2006082400737_2.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Steve said...

Kirk,

Unfortunately, the link doesn't work.

I just keep thinking of that famous Kerry quote: ""...how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

Kirk said...

Hmm, the link didn't come out right and I bet you have links disabled.

It's the White House Briefing column from yesterday's Washington Post. It's a story about the Administration and top GOP leaders pressuring the CIA to find and publish more omnious threats from Iran than the CIA has been willing to do so far.

Sound familiar?

Here's an attempt at an old fashioned hyperlink

Steve said...

Ok, yeah, that link worked.

They're obviously up to it again but the GOP Congress is running scared. And in November the Communists,errr I mean Democrats may be running the show so maybe...

Nah, it's too much to hope for...